cpu/esp8266: fix of set func in periph/pwm
In the `pwm_set` function, the switch-on and switch-off times for PWM channels were only determined for the following phase, but not for the current phase. This could result in a missing duty cycle when calling the function `pwm_set` if the switch-on time of the current phase was not yet reached or to an extended duty cycle if the switch-off time of the current phase had not yet been reached.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f9e1857f7
commit
d3e0b78f7c
@ -183,23 +183,35 @@ void pwm_set(pwm_t pwm, uint8_t channel, uint16_t value)
|
||||
CHECK_PARAM (value <= _pwm_dev.res);
|
||||
|
||||
uint32_t state = irq_disable();
|
||||
uint32_t phase = _pwm_dev.cycles - _pwm_dev.cycles % _pwm_dev.res + _pwm_dev.res;
|
||||
uint32_t phase = _pwm_dev.cycles - _pwm_dev.cycles % _pwm_dev.res;
|
||||
uint32_t next_on = phase;
|
||||
uint32_t next_off;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (_pwm_dev.mode) {
|
||||
case PWM_LEFT:
|
||||
_pwm_dev.chn[channel].next_on = phase;
|
||||
next_on = phase;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case PWM_RIGHT:
|
||||
_pwm_dev.chn[channel].next_on = phase + _pwm_dev.res - value;
|
||||
next_on = phase + _pwm_dev.res - value;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case PWM_CENTER:
|
||||
_pwm_dev.chn[channel].next_on = phase + (_pwm_dev.res - value) / 2;
|
||||
next_on = phase + (_pwm_dev.res - value) / 2;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
_pwm_dev.chn[channel].next_off = _pwm_dev.chn[channel].next_on + value;
|
||||
next_off = next_on + value;
|
||||
|
||||
if (_pwm_dev.cycles >= next_on) {
|
||||
next_on += _pwm_dev.res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (_pwm_dev.cycles >= next_off) {
|
||||
next_off += _pwm_dev.res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
_pwm_dev.chn[channel].next_on = next_on;
|
||||
_pwm_dev.chn[channel].next_off = next_off;
|
||||
_pwm_dev.chn[channel].duty = value;
|
||||
|
||||
irq_restore(state);
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user