There is no real reason for that pseudo-module to use the `gnrc_` prefix. Neither does it need GNRC-components (except, but optionally, as a network stack of course), nor is it implemented with in the GNRC network stack.
There is no real reason for that pseudo-module to use the `gnrc_` prefix. Neither does it need GNRC-components (except, but optionally, as a network stack of course), nor is it implemented with in the GNRC network stack.